Voting Day is Always Within 2 Months Away; With just an hour or 2 of research, I found 16 uuber-affordable legit banks with 10-50 real branches, and I didn’t even explore 3 other regions available in the finviz filtering options ==== epic implications: you’re always within 2 months of a shareholder voting day!!!!! No year long waits. {but be wary of strategic stock classifications, which can make creep gaining and consolidating majority voting rights, fucking elusive} ===> Why not force long term debt obligations to be handled by the bank via bond issuance secured by committed, callable bond, 30 day process?? - :) ====> nope, because….. It has to be structured in a way that they can be paid back with loans. Maybe just a request (by you as POA donee) for a secured ‘ira loan’, secured by callable collateral (their stocks), SEPERATE from any balance swap obligation, real or perceived, assumed or implied/incurred, finance a new ira with your loan = . It has to benefit them in an additional way.

====> Push through strategic partnership with creative client recruiting llc, with a 110% (of amount expended to creep gain majority) in an unsecured line of credit, as primary term of strategic partnership = separate entities entirely, so there’s no conflict of interest & entirely sole discretionary spending authority [recommend that this secondary fund new ira’s with the excess callable credit as a ‘favor’? to us + our graces = NO, OUTDATED, read further] & loan approval process (the approval was inclusive in the strategic partnership + since its unsecured, the loan amount/credit limit is not contingent on the stock price, which is subject and prone to fluctuation)?????

====> Be wary of bank legal structure regarding, once upon a time I read about how no one person can own more than 20%, PROBLEM SOLVED: remember you are forming a proxy majority, bunch of 0.5% owners in a coalition of the POA-spoken for willing, to push through desired changes come voting day, as the POA donee of all these individual investors, who individually own 0.5% or less, you (POA donee) will donate proxy votes of your donors to an agreeable secondary stock holder, who will speak/vote on behalf of the COLLECTIVE = our strategy to gain the majority :)
_______________________________________________________________
Strategic partnerships entail sharing facilities and resources, creatively and efficiently, to attain maximum output and mutual benefit —- issue here is that assets under management, are not the banks assets to share………………It is their fucking resources and capacity and acceptable, as long as the strategic partnership doesn’t stipulate or deliver quid pro quo, via monetary gain to the bank outside of interest?

===> Direct loan is infinitely more practical than a bond issue/purchase, which requires underwriting fees and a process.

====> Use the strategic partnership framework to force through an expedited loan approval , the terms will be mutually beneficial - but only in monetary terms for the secondary, since you’re in the majority regardless, the other side may benefit in a non-monetary way, that is to have the fiduciary authority of the 51% remain in agreeable hands, to prevent future hostile takeovers that may wish to curb shareholder dividends down from our new standard.

They do this by using some of their resources to strategically appease the 51%, effectively committing their shares to a ‘proxy trust’, which is highly beneficial to the bank. There is no monetary gain to the bank, outside of interest on the loan, its ‘strategic’, in that, they benefit by securing the ultimate poison pill and defense against corporate raids by being granted limitless fiduciary authority over 51% share positions, by the secondary, who doesn’t own the 51%, because that’s disallowed for bank ownership, but locked them in limited ownership, 0 rights, still with original owners = proxy majority collective [99 year ‘seat filler’ role, strictly to circumvent 20% max, bank single ownership laws] - and to fulfill this, the secondary must create replacement ira’s, they must. Because POAs are revokable at any moment, the secondary is making that chairman proxy majority power permanent. Which is worth more than whatever price reduction the stock, may suffer, in the process. :) :) :) :), bloody brilliant.

Approving loan to secondary, makes good economic sense and is financially viable on its own, because of their savings bonds recruiting strategy and permissable uses [bond @ bond, fuck expanding with revenue or profits], and strategically necessary because you secure/solidify our proxy majority indefinitely —

- strategic partnership term: sitting chair must sit on board of new partner, to serve as counsel and overseer —-

- strategic partnership term 2: ‘share facilities’, use our branches and staff to promote and register for your campaigns?? Definitely as customer service. —-

- merger term 1: chairman has sole discretionary, continuous spending authority over cash reserves - all requests for capital must be made through chairman

- merger term 2: In the amendment to bylaws, chairman has sole authority to allocate callable credit and cash reserves on loan requests that he thinks are necessary

- epic chevron appeal: express inevitability and intent to replace entire board come voting day, so its leave then, penniless, or leave now $100m wealthier a piece, for approving same exact merger

EQUALLY CRUCIAL: Secondary’s Loan Request Proposition: need funding to incentivize and turnkey radio ad campaign to recruit roth ‘rollovers’ @ internally issued savings bonds. The primary permissable purpose for which is retiring existing debt obligations, yours being priority - Viability: need a 0.1% success rate for this insanely, genuinely appealing offer to repay all debt. (ie. 5k spot reaches 250k people and is attention grabbing as fuck, and demands action: ‘1st 5 get a brand new 2012 jetta’, needs just 1 of those 250k to take up the offer to retire the 15k debt it cost to advertise (5k), deliver offer incentive (10k) ===> ultrafucking viability, no reason not to approve that shit, woadie

===> Additionally, an amendment to bylaws should be that chairman holds supreme veto and ‘first glance’ allocation proposition & subsequent approval authorities, not a collective vote or judgement. The individual discretion previously sustained by loan officers is now held exclusively by chairperson. ====> remember, the logic behind: how can a loan officer or investment manager or bond trader that probably structured 1000s of transactions, not work for or own a company that that once benefited from their discretionary decision to approve the transaction with that company, especially if & when all debts and transactions have been honored and retired, as will surely be the case. Its impractical, and unnecessary to have such rules and regulations, especially when bond traders/ investment managers/ loan officers regularly engage in such transactions at their discretion with most/all fortune 500 companies, especially when the aforementioned conditions apply.

__________________________________________________________

Staple Expansion Activity of Financial Institutions; Even if internal bond issues must be structured/issued through an investment bank, and consequently, we have to deal with bond agent, its gravy: because the primary permissable purpose of bonds is ‘expansion of business’, (next to ‘paying off, retiring, existing debt obligations - which is the secondary permissable purpose) ====> but back to ‘business expansion’ being the primary permissable purpose: the incentivizing and recruiting of new clients, iras, funds to manage/invest is the staple ‘expansion’ activity of financial firms, it is undoubtedly permissable. As such, we can easily work though a bond agent, if its required.
______________________________________________________________
Stock Reclassification; after the chevron merger into 2 = crucially necessary - since as the people with fiduciary authority over the majority’s shares, we approve their reclassification into Class AA Preferred, which has no impact on individual voting rights, because our fiduciary authority translating into consolidated control depends on the pooling of their individual voting authorities. 2 forms: class aa preferred (which gives up something, giving them preferred and priority access to dividends) + existing class a common stock (which remains as such, never restructured or reclassified or tampered with, and is owned by the other 38%, as such the dividends they receive, if any at all, is entirely at our discretion. Be it 0, they have no minority shareholder violations to quell about, because its apples vs oranges, preferred vs common)

=============> the case for liquidity summarized :) —: market stock ownership is utterly dominated by long term, institutional investors — the name of their game is not speculation, but rather buy&hold, as such the most appealing feature of a stock becomes guaranteed, massive dividends as a fixed rate of profits, which has been unheard of, until we brought it up with our chevron merger, as such our slots become uuber valuable to the only players that matter, institutional investors = case for liquidity :)
________________________________________________________________
CLARITY: Critical to understand and distinguish how exactly loaning to swappers FUNCTIONS, because using assets under management to retire company debts is strictly prohibited, as it should be, naturally —- the target firm in the merger acts as a guarantor/creditor, the loan requests will be legit discretionary requests ===> literally a ‘jumbo secured credit card!!!’ => no justification, reasoning, loan request proposition necessary for secured credit cards, instant approval shit, because its dollar for dollar risk free

===> This extended line of credit has to be separate from any kind of obligation, it can/should be structured as all a part of the overall guarantee ie. ”you get a complimentary 50k line of credit, jumbo secured credit card, which will be secured by your net ira balance in the form of the stocks by default, if not otherwise specified’ + PRODUCT TESTING thing should be lithke investment management, institutional investor fiduciary authority granted through comprehensive POA

===> OR entire product testing can be try this ‘jumbo secured credit card’?

====>DON’T need to exclusively pursue 5+ year Rothers for this effort, because Self Directed = direct lossless rollover. Stocks = uuber-permissable allocation and investments for self directed iras. POW-POW-POW
—————————————————————————————————
CLARITY Pt. 2: Balance Swap (we keep and sell their stocks, they keep line of credit limit balance => so that entire structure of outgoing capital being a loan, is a purely momentary, transitionary phase, the purpose of which is to facilitate the transfers, more efficiently) in the form of auto-default (after which the guarantor becomes primary holder/debtor of that debt obligation, freeing swappers from any financial obligation to the bank, therefore nullifying the funds’ ‘loan’ status) on secured line of credit @ ira that has a guarantor, which will be the secondary, since his business model is one of exponential expendable capital growth = very low risk, effort, fast turnaround.

===> these kind of offers ‘new car to 1st 50, on rollovers of 50k+ ira’s’, have people line up around the fucking block, the same day it gets out. Headquarters for customer service and planning, but structuring the shit as a time sensitive, mass appeal event = park hyatt ballroom is appropriate, functional, turnkey

===> Abigail Kirsche Motherfucking Event Planning (advertising, accommodations, stationary, signage, staffing, notaries, and p-o-a}: Lithke Capital ‘retire in riches’ event this sunday, 7pm, park hyatt ballroom - first 50 to open our new platinum rollover ira {savings bond} get $10,000 [***or 20% of whatever your balance***] = demands action, 90 day lock-in is ultra-reasonable
——————————————————————————————————-
CLARITY PT. 3: Since its a loan and not income, they don’t pay taxes on it, once we create the new roth for them. ‘it is no longer credit, but instead a balance swap, ira grant to you’

 » The Case for Not Waiting Until Voting Day; Maybe fuck waiting for the annual shareholder meeting/voting day, but probably not. The case for not waiting; once you you creep gain majority, express and affirm inevitability of the entire board’s replacement come voting day, making them very agreeable to the pre-meeting day merger proposition which benefits them enormously vs. Voting day painful hostile takeover/raid.

===> The case for waiting until voting day; Its very risky here not to do so, because they are inclined to agree, but its still their decision to make. Also!! , our obligations, commitments, guarantees, liabilities are all assumed by the bank, so I am no longer personally liable for anything, no matter their level of outrage or paranoia. Better wait for voting day, so you’re cleared of all personal liability, now and forever. Forward all inquiries, grievances to the banks legal counsel , law firm, or department —- they handle that + There’s one every 2 months, or less, so its not that long.

Position of Strength: Purchasing Party assumes all liabilities, obligations, commitments, and guarantees previously made by acquired party. LLC or Corp = No individual is personally liable, especially since its all lossless. :)

PERFECTION PURSUANT PT.2 (Work-In-Progress ~~~ Needs Editing)

SLIGHTLY OUTDATED, BUT PROBABLY RELEVANT ==> Buy majority shares of optimumbank holdings, then replace own positions with funds from existing institutional stock holdings = guaranteed acceptance because no cumbersome put option in place. By making self chairman of optimumbank, I have dominion over profits and capital resources =====> holy fucking instant turnaround = selling and buying stocks ====> holy fucking facilitation off of direct ira rollovers to self directed iras, etc where stocks are an infinitely permissable investment ==> word to etrade. ====> golden parachute rationale to rush and push through merger: communicate the inevitability of this merger, and that it can happen in 2 ways: either annual meeting day, where they’re all given the boot and are left out in the rain, or the board approves it immediately and get 50M each, which is very worth it, because the whole effort costs 20B ==> 1st this shit 2nd separation of duties, usechairman post to influence direction of discretion possessed by senior loan officers, so you can approve loan that will finance secondary’s identical ira @ ira savings bonds effort, to be assumed eventually, once the exponential growth makes the fund reach the 20B benchmark ==> 3rd chevron bound. Just clarify exactly how the secondary will pursue ira @ ira growth. Direct rollovers, surely, but are internally issued bonds permissable investments under fdic and sec regulations?? Probably the easiest part of the entire puzzle. Additionally, are institutional investor banks allowed to hold their own stocks as positions on behalf of the investors/retirees whose funds they manage?? ====> the ultimate solution for the secondary, once they’re flushed in a 5m loan, is just cashing in their fucking ira’s and doubling up, growing exponentially, the way you structure the reception of the funds is as an internally issued corporate bond where the commonly permitted usages include: relieving old debt (bond recovering bonds), and expansion (in the event of there being a bond disbursement agent, in the process that only releases funds to pre-stated reasons, that’s fine, because attracting ira rollovers is totally standard expansion for a financial institution, as the secondary will be working through)

=====> Although it makes the process infinitely more streamlined and loose, it still has very cumbersome features - specifically: 35% tax and penalty obligations incurred during the cash out = adds 7B to our 20B total ira, maybe more, you can quite easily just peg a 7B long term bond debt obligation to chevron, which can be paid off in a matter of months, with their profits => awesome, 1-time loan to secondary, see you 20B strong = just 5 fucking rounds from 5m = 25m > 125m > 625m > 3.125b > 16b…… Money. ====> acquiring small bankle - amendment to bylaws, so there’s a shareholder meeting every week, or whatever minimum time frame is permissable. So the followup merger proposal the next shareholder meeting between lithke and the bankle, states that I an chairman and new management - new practice in lending, makes chairman the director of lending and loan approvals, approve crucial projects, let one off. Did it. =====> even though the typical shareholder meeting amount is once per year , is it typical at all for there to be multiple?? Have to do it all at once, chevron-force buyout merger via inevitability by buying around board via institutional spinoffs DOES NOT apply here, have to buy it all at once. We’ll see. Maybe, when it comes to hostile takeovers, a buyout offer demands immediate attention and can be acted on immediately by shareholders, this would explain acquirers campaigns to sway the majority. Offer board golden parachutes to approve buyout immediately? It needs to be relatively immediate, fuck waiting around for months for chance. Besides ‘hostile takeovers are fast’, according to ehow. ===> that 20% rollover promo bonus enables you to impose a very reasonable 90-day lock-in exit date, where they can’t withdraw for any reason = time2flip

__________________________________________________________

»OUTDATED«: The shares are priced at $0.80+ each, so 50K Volume aint shit - No buyout premium. Creep proxy tender that shit = no need for simultaneous amendment to bylaws- if 9m is the controlling share @ 20/share = 450k shares and that fucking bankle appeared in the 50k+ daily volume bracket = 10 days of creep proxy to gain a fucking majority = infinitely cheaper, because we’re just buying stocks, no giant acquisition advisory fees, buy all available shares everyday for like 2 weeks. Then come voting day, force through merger that puts you in managerial control, as should be the case, since we’re in the voting majority anyways. During the interim of recovering the RPF money, approve loan, then recover funds by re-allocating existing institutional positions by selling enough holdings - shareholders have to wait an entire year to sack me anyways, im ready to resign as soon we let off that loan. —- roth —- guaranteed job , or 5k cash —- job guarantee includes product testing, would you be into this, this, this, or this? Notarized Waiver and POA as per this guarantee === streamlined, cheap, same day 100% rpf. Send product testing payment via certified mail —- waiver primary term ‘any one of there pre-agreed upon compensation, stipend’d things qualify as a job, as defined by us’ ====> straight up roth management???? {cash out = 0 tax obligation or early withdrawal penalty past 5 years} ====> Fuck cash out ==> this works: any ira @ self directed direct rollover @ tender creep proxy buyout

==> Enables us to define satisfactory compensation levels at our discretion to meet the guarantee, $5-$10 via certified mail ——- ”sir, were you present at the job fair? According to our records, you signed for the employment placement program and product placement sections. Would you like us to revoke this? Ok, sure thing. We will get that processed for you, sorry for the misunderstanding. Give it 3-8 weeks to process’

________________________________________________________________

CRUCIAL INSIGHTS: Even if institutional investors can’t buy their own stocks with client funds, which isn’t necessarily known just yet, a secondary epic, and totally functional way of doing this can be: cash in managed, callable, extended funds and secured 1:1 risk free loan it to the swappers, takeover financiers, in the form of a replacement ira, the loan being guaranteed by their stocks —— it can all fall under the ‘i gotta do what I gotta do’, to meet the guarantee. You have the discretion (hostile merger with preferred terms), authority (amendment to bylaws, fusion & consolidation of loan officer discretionary judgement & authority wth Chairman position), and safety (callable collateral) to expedite loan wires, 24 hours, especially if its signed off by chairman. Banks lose nothing, because it has to do with share ownership, the purchase price from which, they never receive —- they benefit and asses are covered by the miraculous phenomena of fractional reserve banking, and they already met the reserve with other deposits, since the funds their calling in to finance the loans, were already extended, and by that very fact, they weren’t the reserves.

The following is fucking crucial::::::::: The agreement/guarantee is with Lithke, but after the hostile takeover merger optimumbank holdings —- all Lithke debts, obligations, commitments become the banks, no matter the nature of how these obligations were incurred, ie. We Guaranteed this, and now we’re one company, so we guaranteed this = motherfucking awesome —— And a pre-determined and poa agreed upon way of facilitating the return of their funds can be via secured 1:1 loan, in the form of a deposit and creation of an ira account under our poa authority. Or direct rollover from our own. Pre-justified as the process for getting their funds back to them. Permanent placeholders.

PERFECTION PURSUANT (4-24-2012):

Exploring ratio between cost of gaining control and cash reserves/callable long term credit gained in return…. The implications may prove to be astounding. Because it may offer a way to eliminate long term exposure to money, additionally just need funds to act as place holders, entirely justifiable, since for the privilege of being FDIC insured, banks must invest IRAs safely with mutual funds, (Update Brah: The Glass-Steagal Act was repealed about a decade ago, so those deposits can be used for investment banking purposes..) so they are already heavy institutional ownership, just move the funds for strategic purposes via put options to be bought back momentarily…

_________________________________________________________________

Placeholders whose positions are permanent and unmoving, but whose funds are instantly recovered with the acquired firms cash reserves & long term credit capacity, giving them immediate liquidity and recovery of funds, and the recovery passes their funds off to us - wtf is a 20b bond, collateralized with shares, to chevron? The long term debt obligation is placed to eliminate the place holder monies from any long term exposure, actual and relative, and us from any fiduciary responsibility to original relocated IRA, but it remains with acquired Chevron -holdings fund spin offs, but new terms are defined through forced merger —- since they are being permanently held as well…… Previously observed market cap:deposits ratio in the financial industry applies to investment banks undoubtedly…. Pursue firms who deal almost exclusively in stock portfolio investing, or any other call-able investments (institutional grade bonds, blue chip stocks), so that a maximum amount of the quoted deposits/assets is useable, for the purpose of strategic relocation, and value-added recovery —- quick clarification: no line of credits shall be used in end institutions, just long term credit capacity, comparable to on-call bond —— this process functions excellently for the final chev forced merger, hostile takeover, but not necessarily up the ladder, you need hyper leap capacity —— remember, another benefit of hedge funds is that the exit dates put pressure on managers to maintain liquidity, BUUUT they aren’t public companies!!!!! So they fucking aren’t accessible or timely things to pursue —-

_________________________________________________________________

Hyper Leaps:

you can quite easily do the the final process all the way up the ladder, it can serve as your hyper leap as well….. Buy investment bank 1x, liquidate call-able holdings at present value for 5x, do cash reserve swap (instantly recovering the 5x) and gain long term position in targeted firm, where our new-found authority gained in forced merger and ensuing restructuring is used to add long term debt obligations to firm, effectively gaining 5x cash, no strings attached , because original 5x was recovered with reserve cash - long term position also guarantees a return, so no put option necessary for old, diversified positions and holdings —- doubly effective and justifiable, as untraditional as it is to buy funds (maybe convert to cds, which is a loan to the banking institution itself), because a recovery and hefty return can be delivered to the placeholders off of our cash reserve raiding authority + long term bond credit assuming capacity, gained via long term holding and restructuring of end entity, allows us to utilize those resources to deliver the recovery and return —- glass steagal act was repealed, but reinstated in the past decade, so American investment banks get fat off of general public deposits, this is has been the case with other G8 country investment banks for the longest time, Glass-Steagal is a strictly American concoction — relatively, super affordable as well: 15% of aum of 51% of chevron institutional shareholder money = about 15b for BP, it would be about 9.7b, which is interesting, because both of these companies have 20b+ cash reserves, which can easily, sufficiently restore funds and deliver a 25% return —- as far as long term credit capacity goes, just use the institutional investors’ shares as collateral to then issue a 20b+ bond —- I just realized this strategy is just a variation on congressional legislature strategy and corporate creep proxy strategy, where they quietly rally enough likely voters to push through legislation or mergers/acquisition, both ways are perceived as hostile by opposition, because it doesn’t care at all about compromising with minority vote-holders .

___________________________________________________________________

Key Insights:

> Case for liquidity = losing voting rights increases liquidity dramatically since 7%+ dividend guarantee is uuber appealing to the institutional money that makes up 70% of 4 trillion market, force through a free merger, proposition a disposition and divestiture, investment bank valuation similar to commercial bank valuation at 8:1+ aum and valuation ratio, Nasdaq lists all institutions that own shares and make up the majority —- Institutional Investors (Investment Banks, Pension Funds, Insurance Giants) regularly own the majority of these giant corporations —- 60% of boards are declassified, meaning they don’t have staggered boards, which is an effective defensive tactic companies use to thwart aggressive unsolicited acquisitions, which means that 60% of the market and of all companies are vulnerable to hostile takeovers.

A.B.S. are typically triple A or double A rated investments - due to securitization and credit enhancement and underwriting fee. Investors salivate for the opportunity. 30b profits , 20b cash reserves, . —-. Appease the 2 stock holder types (mutual pool and speculative individual) with respective class type in the restructuring , give speculative investors a 15% premium and 5% for added marketability, effectively delivering a instant return to buyers - the sell off represented by goldman - appease the mutual pool holders with 8% guaranteed return for 10 years, by freezing and prioritizing the most recent dividend rate —- . Even better, USURP mutual fund holders by jacking their investors — by paying 250 to each to guarantee an 8% return, buried in agreeable and mutually beneficial nuance, and manually requesting the removal and cash out of their funds using that motherfucking POWER OF ATTORNEY!!!! - depends on what kind of money is held in mutual funds, you can’t just cash out 401ks, but you can for ira’s, and pay back that 30b tax obligations and penalty with profits (since its not due for a good 9+ months) + cash reserves + added bonds (30b bond is just 4.5b per year obligation for a decade) ——. No tax obligation by doing the POA via mutual fund company, so its a direct rollover and transfer of managerial/fiduciary authority, but you can’t own the mutual fund, because that’s conflict of interest - strategic partnership that shit with existing mutual fund, ‘every new account we deliver you must be invested in this way, then you can keep the fucking 150b for your own management after 10 years, we can pay you 1b for this deal’ - infinitely more agreeable, because who ever owns the money decides who moves their money, and poa gives us discretionary authority to move their funds as per the agreement —- eliminates need for 20b for premium — since massive dividend is guaranteed, voting rights are expendable =  logic as mutual fund fiduciary   ________________________________________________________________

»»»»»»»»»»»»UPDATED««««««««««

EFFICIENCY: Propose strategic partnership through Goldman to get existing mutual holders to spin off chevron holdings into independent funds and sell it to us, in exchange for us guaranteeing their profits on those managed holdings for life = just 2b out of our 30b profits ==> then we give the purchased fund, with existing holdings, unmoved, to 2nd mutual fund —- no need to cop that 120b hedge, because we now speak for mutual spinoffs chevron holders via proxy partnership with secondary mutual fund - you can complete restructuring and chairman appointment by doing a merger via goldman, and pushing it through with mutual proxy authority —- remember the good wife episode, proxy fight, getting mutual funds to move their 55k shares over —-

No need for 30b bond to acquire 120b hedge for acquisition-swap out via put option. Potentially only need 10b to buy 110b mutual fund (as per bank valuation model and stats), no need for premium and added marketability for the 35% speculative holders , because we have the majority already by a long shot, and its a democracy, so minority share holders can oppose all they want, they’re the minority. Massive implications: 10b bond can be retired instantly with cash reserves = debt free offbat = REIT-Swap is ultra temporary and risk-free —- during the interim of the reit-swap, retire the bonds, then exercise put option, to return their assets, exactly as taken —- during interim of mutual pass off to secondary mutual umbrella, instill agreeability by structuring strategic partnership in a way that demands collaboration  _________________________________________________________________

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: potentially acquire publicly traded ETF mutual funds instead of hedge via hostile take over bids, then cashing in all stock positions, because its never enough/company to force a ‘run on the market’ drop in value, to avoid painful 6+ month acquisition advisory periods and typical time frames - WAIT, why does it need to be a bond, if its recoverable immediately with cash reserves, keep it as a cashed in mutual or hedge= no REIT-held or underwriting fees paid!!!!!!!

_______________________________________________________________

Food For Thought Part 2;

I suspect, and am sure, that there is an interesting ratio between the liquidity and illiquidity of already lent deposits of investment/retail bank holding companies. Investment Banks service both long-term retirees, as well as speculative accredited investors, so the name of the game is modest, but competitive returns + liquidity, because accredited investors have access to exit periods, whereas IRAs and 401Ks are not callable, unless retiree wants to suffer severe penalties and balance reductions

If the vast majority of a bank’s dormant deposits are from retirement accounts - and retail banks, probably . Remember, if glass steagal act was repealed and never reinstated. A lot of these institutional banks like JPG Morgan and State Street, have retail sides or partnerships, that finance their mutual fund, stock investing activities. It would be stupid for banks to be overextended by putting all their lent money into illiquid investments, that take forever to recover.

Focus on investment/retail bank hybrids that obsess over liquidity, so that the majority of their positions and holdings, on behalf of their clients, are call-able. Stocks, Bonds, Credit Markets, etc.

Direct, Public Bank Acquisition and pass-off via hostile takeover bid, to be approved immediately by majority voting share holders, is far easier, than mutual fund acquisition - because mutual funds, are funds, and not companies and are not as accessible, defineable, on the stock market as bank holding corporations - for the purpose of acquisition and liquidation.

REMEMBER: The mutual fund spin-off acquisition to restructure firm and control MODEL, is applicable to any kind of company, including banks. 20B market cap investment/retail banks, would cost 3B to control the controlling mutual fund fiduciary agents authority, and has access to 100B callable, liquid capital.

~~Probably UNNECESSARY and CUMBERSOME - You just need 15B+, not 50B+

THIS IS MY DISSERTATION, MY OPUS, MY LEGACY ~ PERFECTION (3/20/12);

Give chevron put option accepting folks added marketability by offering chevron cash reserves (10b @ 200b chevron buy) to prospective buyers as a premium to buying their shares, by calling it an instant 5% dividend (banks, mutual fund managers spend all year hitting that mark) structured and marketed by morgan) - so they have an easy way to exit their shares, before necessarily discovering the applied nuance —— how to effectively secure 1st 6b then 30b without immediate payback demand: as an added primary contingent to buying the fund and delivering 10% premium to investors, compel managers to use their discretion to compel investors to agree to converting fund to illiquid, high yield fund with 22% guaranteed return for 5 years or less, depending on whenever we recover your principal - its guaranteed off its cdo structuring, where off 30b projected profits they get first dibs on it to secure their relatively minimal 6b - shouldn’t be a stretch of a conversion, because hedges investors typically don’t take advantage of exit dates, because there are no other type of funds that can match that kind of performance —- can pay it off in 3 years, if we eliminate dividends, since issuing them is entirely at our discretion ——- potential but improbable alteration: creep tender offer acquire 51%, premium-free, push through acquisition of other 49% with put option provision and restructuring, then exercise put option to recover other 49% immediately, then use un-used 20b bond to entice market participants to buy your shares at a 20% premium (scary, because we don’t know how the share value was affected by restructuring, we can’t stomach that potential loss alone), put option can be immediately recovered at strike price with no affect from outside market factors = massive advantage of prior strategy: burying it in nuance and giving them added marketability, besides that 20% premium @ 51% majority has to be used regardless, this way is much better —— another acceptable and natural contingent of the 10% hedge buy premium can be to reinstate the 2% management fee, because the previous management expended the original 2%, besides its coming out of our premium, so they still enjoy a net gain of 8% = 100M out of 5B, since we’re starting there, beyond 1B RPF

__________________________________________________________

****UPDATE****UPDATE****UPDATE****UPDATE****UPDATE:

Even way better, repay the 30b hedge expenditure with bond overage walk away - because, the bond extends term to 10 years and has way more favorable interest terms and obligation, which is 5% instead of arbitrary 20% (which is a selling point anyways , not guaranteed, and fucking questionable from an investors point of view) = 1.5b/year interest and 3b/year principal accumulation = 4.5b total, instead of 12b total off that 6b 20% interest and 6b principal accumulation to finish it 5 years (because 6b interest is cumbersome and economically unsustainable for longer than that) = frees up 7.5B/year (30% of profits) even after delivering record dividends —— issue 30b bond with same hedge resources that secured the first 50b, after recovering them with put option, by spinning off subsidiary with bond debt, effectively restoring acquired assets with put option ready status, as we define and nuance it —— Massive Insight: use power of majority to push through an acquisition- restructuring, since put option will definitely be triggered and its no premium to the other 49% anyways = never buy other 49%, just force through restructuring (no put option necessary, because we’re not buying, there’s no cash to get back) after actually acquiring the voting majority, probably use framework of acquisition to impose restructuring to force a shareholder vote on the internal/external proposition = reduced total hedge funds necessary to carry out chevron acquisition & restructuring by 40%!! »> @220b market cap = 80b+ dropped from the final bill, just need 20b on top the original 120b = reduces size of total bonds necessary (for final buy/re structuring & long term position/debt - doesn’t include 30b for immediately recovered reit-swap) down to just 50B total!! (including 20b premium @51% chevron and 30b {for hedge>30b bond>120b hedge recovered}) —- restructuring forced through: give up voting rights, etc, for added marketability of shares and 20% cash premium, etc, etc —— debt repayment schedule: retiring the 50b bond within 5 years makes the yearly bills 12.5b [10b for principal accumulation, 2.5b for annual interest expense], BUT paying it off over 10 years frees up another 5b a year, making the total freed up profits near 15b!!! not even including 7b delivered dividends, which can always be added to that total profits count at our discretion, and only adds 12.5b to the final tally/grand total off of 5 more years of 2.5b annual interest bill —— massively reduces chance of default = affordable and accessible credit default swaps —- REIT-swap nuance and weighted concessions = give up ability to sell (not an issue, because reit investments are fixed income for pensioners and the like) and ‘always remain like this’ , cash can count same as physical asset, capacity to use as collateral, etc in exchange for guaranteed full occupancy income for life, doubled immediately, matched beyond the event of default/seizure, should that ever happen, premium up front (can make the claim of income for the life of collateralized bond, because default on secured debt affects only collateral, in that they are seized and liquidated, but not the asset whose acquisition or development was financed by that collateralized bond, because its not a mortgage, its debt that’s externally secured by a secondary asset source apart from actual end-purchase, chevron in this case, which will forever remain in our possession even in the event of a default} —- (keep in mind that to secure 50b bonds, you need 100b total hedge: half to swap a company to issue the 50b bond and the other half for reit- swap to secure the issued bond, but the 25b hedge used to pay for that 100b hedge, has to be recovered with a bond, and to do so we need to add double (50b) that to the hedge pile (100b) to do the pre-chevron swaps……… But then you need more than 25b (38B) to get the 150b which only reimburses the 25b = just convert 25b hedge to walk-away, issuing-party collateralized bond

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Walk-Away Bond Execution {>OUTDATED<}: Use service feature of our sell-side m&a service that we will pay for your underwriting fee (5b or less underwrites 50b and will be reimbursed by chevron cash reserves), we retain the right to reclaim/re-purpose the debt, if we can use the bond with our resources to find a more suitable LBO opportunity, specifically one that presents a significantly higher profit::market cap ratio, industry stability via projected revenue comparison, etc + new collateral assurance = risk free hand-off, and makes acquisition with walk-away provision, that much more acceptable and pitchable.

*********Follow-Through Bond Execution: Since apparently with Bonds, there is a paying agent, through which you order your purchases, orders, and other projects that the bonds were issued for. Which is fine, since hedge fund investors have long ass in between exit dates, especially since we will create a single 6-month one, upon purchase, and entire bond issue process takes 1 month, and hedge purchase nothing, and stock purchase not much. It can be done, and swap out hedgers money later after final acquisition is made.

Credit Enhancement is a Staple Part of Bond Issuance, which is why it makes financing bonds such a sure fucking thing, and financial institutions so fucking willing to quickly step up and underwrite the bond issue, individually or collectively, because the Credit Enhancement is a insurance policy against the interest payments and a Letter of Credit is an insurance policy against the full principal in the event of default on Maturity date —- this makes bond underwriters willing participants and bond holders willing to finance the issue, especially since; “The vast majority of ABS are issued in one of the top two generic credit rating categories, either triple-A or double-A.”

_____________________________________________________________

Bury Stipulations & Terms in Agreeable and Mutually Beneficial Nuance.

REIT Weighted Concessions, are agreeable and massively beneficial: Nature of Commercial Real Estate is that, so long as you remain a majority lease holder, in a capacity equivalent to ownership and have the authority to service the tenants via sub leases - The prospects of collecting profits and income remain in tact, and unfettered. REIT Investments are fixed income, for pensioners and bond holders. They purchase high-demand, class A properties - that have proven their leas-ability and viability by having a full building of long term tenants, especially since the terms on those Class A office buildings is 3-5-10 years ~ They are not in the Flipping properties business, they are in the hold and collect income business. The primary implication of this that during REIT-Swap, we are returning the properties with virtually the same capacity, function, status, etc. as before. Even if we return it to them as Majority Free-Lease Holders and Collateralized. Credit Default Swaps also assure against any risk of monetary loss. Bury these stipulations in agreeable and mutually beneficial nuance.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Agreeable & mutually beneficial nuance FTW: Restructuring, converting your shares from common stock to Class A Premium stock @ 51% and Class AA Choice Stock @ 48%+ = “Premium” & “Choice” in that they deliver 25X-100x dividend of Class B stock @ Class AA and Class A respectively, and 2x your current amount @class a, guaranteed dividend frozen/matched for 2 years and unprecedented added marketability for your shares via instant 5% premium to your prospective buyers, and finally a 20% premium up front (@ 51% class a) —- in exchange for weighted concession: give up/reduce voting rights, pre-emptively agree to new bylaws, agree to put option —- structure restructuring through the framework of a merger/strategic partnership with leni capital, who provided collateral for bonds, and structured restructuring. Mergers tend to involve restructuring target corporations anyhow. Maybe not a literal one, because the lack of prestige my have a negative affect on the brand and the stock, maybe just a private restructuring with no partnership, merger, or strategic partnership.

******************Since the notion of losing voting rights must appear in the contract text, and since it is in the fiduciary duty of the Thousand+ mutual, pension and hedge funds that hold Chevron stock on the behalf of their investors. They will probably be very wary of such a stipulation - Additionally, the 20% premium just won’t have the same effect on sellers collectives, with the Put option provision involved. It may be a good idea, to reconsider just how to structure the nuance of this mutually beneficial provision of a put option and added marketability and guaranteed dividends beating averages. You already have a pretty effective model in the REIT- Swap, in that insisting that we retain a return period, when we can return the assets and get all of our money back, and pay you $X, for your inconvenience, is super typical and acceptable, so long as you control what it means to “return as is”, like with commercial properties, as long as they have the continued ability to lease the property which they will/do, and the purchase & cash flow of Chevron can guarantee that cash flow (profits and health of chevron, being completely unrelated to the original bond debt, because it is issued by REIT-swap and not Chevron, even in the event of default, Chevron goes unaffected, especially since it is purchased and swapped out with Hedge funds, and not Bond money) and the Credit enhancement guarantees the principal, strike value of the collateral against loss due to default - We can claim, very reasonably and legitimately, that we will return it as is and risk free, even after committing the assets as collateral to our type of dealings and bond issues. Use this model with Chevron swapees, arguing that it is “return as is”, etc.    

————————————————————————————————

REITS BUYING OTHER REITS, BONDS? = Makes Ultimate Sense = No need for double hedge, double corp, for Reit-Swap, so no need for walk away. ******But how will the bond’s viability be justified if REITs only earn 2% on the total value of their assets/company, in net income/year ???? _____ Solution: REITs should buy profitable mid-cap corps in similar industry, with Income:Market Cap ratios comparable to our final destination; Chevron.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PROCESS:

55B Total Hedge Needed for: 50B Hedge Buys REIT-Swap that issues 50B bond  for re-purposable REIT Purchase ~ 30B of that 50B is then used to straight up 120 Hedge Buy, if a paying agent is involved, as per bond process, that we delegate to. Maybe no free reign over Bond moneys. The other 5B is used for Underwriting fees and/or Credit Enhancement to make our Asset-Backed Security (ABS) bond, a Triple AAA rated investment.

And the other 20B Will be used as 20% Premium offered to 51% of largely speculative investors/shareholders ~ Since current market cap of Chevron is 210B, half is 105B = 20B = roughly 20% premium.

10B hedge needed to buy 50B hedge, can be immediately reimbursed with . But that’s not the total, since we used other hedges, that need to be recovered, to finance the purchase of this hedge.

Final Tally: 1B RPF financed 4B, which financed 16B = 17.5B total, which can be immediately reimbursed with Chevron cash reserves, which is at 20B, currently. 10B hedge buys 50B hedge, and other 5B hedge goes to financing Underwriting fee and/or Credit Enhancement fees for the 50B ABS bond issue.

New Rule: Hedge Holes created to finance purchase of new hedges, will not be immediately reimbursed, because it is unnecessary and cumbersome, and we lose capacity in the process. Besides, the extended exit dates give us plenty time to do so eventually. ***Not including RPF, because 1B RPF + 350M incurred tax penalties need to reimbursed immediately with the purchased hedge.

Massive Insights & Subsequent Implications;

25 Trillion Dollar retirement market hoping for and amazed by a 5% annual return via safe investment. Our top tier golden goose delivers 100% even after factoring in the additional 20M borrower expenditure for which they receive scraps. As owners of master card, we retain the right and discretionary authority to cancel a lenders access to a borrower in the form of providing credit.

Everything is finally accessible now:

>RPF hyper leap via suze orman seminars via abigail kirsch event planning (1B RPF secured per event)

> Hedge fund purchase & restructuring via goldman/morgan M&A buy side advisory with acquisition criteria being: all-assets as cash & instant 12-month lock in & reduced exit dates = in exchange for instant 10% payout & guaranteed additional 20% by years end

> 5X build:value ratio’d residential development loans bought from infinitely prudent china state banks, and sold en masse @ global private equity REITS [as divestiture brokered by goldman M&A], turnkey rental property auctions, individual home buyers, etc.

> Pursue Full-Price Liquidation via by offering Property as Collateral to Secure the Bonds to an company seeking & pursuing of an existing/already structured, pitched, strategized a massive Leveraged Buyout of a Competitor, but since we are providing the collateral, and agree to also handle the interest payments and our assets on the fucking line if the loan is defaulted on, you can utilize a hard ball ass strategy of having final write off of the debt, and primary usage and strategic usage. Since we are the ones whose asses are on the fucking line in the end, we can easily fucking handle that interest payment instead of 500,000 mortgages !!!! You can purchase the company at our discretion. And ultimately just do not buy that shit at fucking all !!!! ~~~ One time liquidation bitch!!! Just say until the shit is done, we will agree to replace all funds we expend for personal reasons, all justified before hand. It is 100% our fucking risk, and since entire bond matures all at one, their credit or reputation isn’t affected worth dick until the 10 years is up. They can even write off the debt to us if we trigger the walk away option, we made available for ourselves. Be the M&A Bond Collateral Syndicate. A majority of Mergers and Acquisitions are leveraged in some capacity. And then …………….. …………..DEFAULT. Let them keep the properties. Fathom the fucking rate of consolidation of: 1, $20B Acquisition/Merger via LBO versus 100,000 Individual Home Buyers for whatever purpose, haggling with Creditors and mortgage lenders and family and etc. Cash Flow as Guarantor of the Interest Rate + Property Assets as Collateral Guarantor of the Bond Debt Obligation.

On a separate, but equally epic note: BOND OF BONDS be that shit: hand off and reentry of existing bond holders for 4% made in 1 day, can’t make that in a year, the place holders get 1% in 1 day - since external bond is exclusively invested in triple AAA sovereign debt bonds, it is also rated Triple A - making it ultra-liquid and tradeable for bond of bond holders. We’re dealing with existing bond volume, no pressure to produce investors or more bonds. Additionally, no pressure to stress about giving them future liquidity - a Triple AAA stamp is a lifetime of peace of mind for us and a life time of liquidity for them, because they should have no trouble selling it.

Just 10B out of 70B total gross proceeds from property sales, producer 200B bond of bonds and subsequently 750B+ of investment to take advantage of tariff trade deals, strategic and efficient shipping port, cheap ass labor, tax breaks in manufacturing (which collectively recover their bond financed factory construction and operational expenditures in just 1 fucking year = holy fucking worth it and economically necessary for them) + to service the brand new 100B wide open, annual spending power = if GDP also reflects direct investment and development and ‘market value of all final goods produced in that country in 1 year’

= That’s a trillion dollar economy, jack.

Even better, it actually constitutes ‘total value of final goods or services produced within a country in 1 year’ and ‘the market value of everything produced within a country, in 1 year, by everyone living and working in that country, citizen or not’ - so the value of those autos built in that new som factory, goes into the newsom gdp - hyundai plant in montgomery produces 340K cars/year = 6B added to gdp, for a 1.4B plant constructed!!!!

= 4X ratio between factory construction cost and amount added to GDP.

> Public RIET industry is valued at $1.7 Trillion.

> REIT Divestiture.

> MasterCard Arbitrage.

SUSTAINABLE HYPER LEAP ATTAINED {2-13-2012}

> RPF Reborn & Revisited, because It can now be sustainably & effectively utilized in the Hedge Buy-Outs; Job fair, sign up 100 product testers for $100 on the spot, to raise 5M (REBIRTH Of Redeemable Pact fund & Preventative Assurance Pact), cash reserves pays for business purchase search & restructuring. The RPF shit is legit, assurance if they are engaging in shadiness, and waiver of liabilities. Also, Hedgie have fucking exit dates, cant touch it for a month, instantly recover their funds, and hand deliver them via courier. 5M RPF, buys 15M+ Liquid Hedge. Now that that’s the case, only need a total of 30K or so in Cash Reserves or Credit, which any company has access to -> NYSE is too god damn expensive, real talk. Find a small market cap exchanges.

> Sunbelt does some generic ass acquisition services, Holla at them OGs at Goldman Sachs for M&A Advisory, they know all the inside players in the investment management and hedge fund world anyways, they keep an internal index. And if Hedge Fund owners are approached on our behalf by Goldman motherfucking Sachs, they take the offer dead serious, and are infinitely more likely to take us up on it. According to M&A Advisor Fees article on exit.com, the base rate for high firms is 100K “Our outstanding professionals have earned a reputation for successfully initiating, negotiating, structuring, and closing middle market mergers, acquisitions and divestitures at purchase price premiums well in excess of industry norms.” ~ Sealed Bid Marketing Out This Mother Fuhrer.

> HYPER LEAP ACHIEVED !!: Off of 1st Ever transaction, use stocks to finance a 100K M&A Acquisition Buy Side Advisory, also 100K to do a Target Center Suze Orman seminar, to secure 1B RPF, to then buy a 4B Hedge Fund. (Which on top of exit dates, have a Lock-In feature, where investors can’t withdraw even after exit dates because paranoia affecting the managers decision to withdraw en masse, does nothing but depreciate the value further)

Product Testing eliminated on Large Scale as well??? Because we can technically control the direction of the public firm through product testers, but getting 10,000s of fucking individuals to become product testers is a pain in the as, not viable, and impossible.

===> Solution: Back to CORPORATE PRODUCT TESTING = Strategic Expansion guarantees doubling of profits, here is your entire annual profits as an ESCROWED fee (1:20 Profit :Assets Ratio)

====> Fee Is Paid after the fact, as a success fee, not before !!! = Possibly do it on the buy-side as well, or haven’t we consolidated that to the same firm. 

====> Utilize the legitimacy and credibility of high end M&A Advisory Services, Goldman Sachs, to establish this Corporate Product Testing; “Strategic Alliance Partnership” ~~

~ The LBO debt will held by and on the Targeted & Acquired Asset + we own the targeted acquired company, so as long as we deliver the profits doubled fee, we walk away with the excess.

Abigail Kirsch Event Planning & Suze Orman Seminar = $1B Target Center RPF

Hedge Fund Acquisition Reasoning & Logic Analogy: Who wouldn’t sell their unlisted house at 2X-3X+ the current value ??? Especially when Hedgies aver shit.

Dont Target Public Companies with these Strategic Alliance, Corporate Product Testing, because their valuations are on their face and publicly available as their MARKET CAPITALIZATION But its a public company so individual shareholders own the assets, not the company itself, so that goes out the window. So Instead Holla at closely held private corporations with expensive assets; Nuclear Power Plants and Hotel Developers, etc. ~~~

~ VALUATION: Utilize Investment Bank M&A Advisory Services, specifically the business valuation service. Done By Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, CitiGroup, Barclays, etc.

Only Expenses so farto execute on a Massive Scale is 1. Matching profits, 2. M&A Advisory Fees, and 3. Paying underwriting fee, etc

Use Professional High End Temporary Employment Staffing Agencies to fill your staffing needs.

Links; bit.ly/zqeZ79, bit.ly/xZSc3V, bit.ly/xxTVd8, bit.ly/r5e3jy, macabacus.com, bit.ly/zskhz3, bit.ly/yC4i4s, and bit.ly/RQvyv.

That fucking life. G650 seclusion, Le Meurice, 190 Barneys, Lenis, Billion Dollar Buyouts and Mergers, Reports prepared by Goldman Buy-Side Advisory Service, Valuations prepared by Morgan Stanley, 500B investment for NewSom, Arsenal or Man United acquisition„„„„„„„„„„„

This is fucking ridiculous.

I am lazy to the point of this shit being a disability. I should be worried, because I am jeopardizing the shit out of my fresh GPA. Honest to god, my schedule is so fucking light and manageable.

If 25% of the 18,000 Students are Seniors = 4500 Seniors/200 Majors = 22.5 Graduates/Major, on average. So only up to 30 accounting people graduate per year from here, that opens the Market up. Every single business, needs in-house or external accounting work/counseling. The job market is wide open.

What the fuck am I doing, the accounting online pearson lab shit, has been available via a Free Trial since the beginning of the Semester. I have nothing but time. And I haven’t done a single homework yet. I have not fallen too behind yet, but I swear to god this shit is unacceptable. Just go to all your fucking classes, prepare for the day ahead, the day before. Cut the shit.

I understand the laziness, I have this beautifully, massive, viable financier game plan - That costs next to nothing up front, and literally is unbelievably viable. And convertable at the end. I see myself living with so much purpose there. How fucking fast is it to purchase a hedge, and convert them assets.

Collateral Guarantor for Corporate Bonds will compel the Underwriting Syndicate to sign off, and we can easily creep proxy the company into signing onto becoming the unconditional guarantor of $X in Corporate Bonds. The underwriting process is a fucking week long. The viability speaks for itself on many levels, but an astounding milestone is definitely when you moved from sheisty Bond for Sheisty shack to eTrade Product Testers, which is inconspicuous, because eTrade credibility, brand recognition speaks for itself - Not to mention, we are telling them to sign up on their own, in their own fucking time, and just prove the accounts creation to us, with all the documents/paperwork/account profile/number, etc.

I definitely need Greenhill advising or much cheaper M&A Advisory consulting, to effectively pull off the Creep Proxy Order of Financing. Which can cost thousands.

Today is a new day, get it together. Its the first day of the rest of your life.

Since you saved a bunch of money, 130 !!!, on the textbook. Go get a gym membership and go to that bitch every morning !!! - New Track. Positivity.

MOTHER.FUCK.PASSIVE.LIVING.

Secure Existing Trillions For Som Pursuit, Existing Bond holders Entice other Global Active Funds to Buy/Hold their Bonds For Just Days for 1%+, with Buy Back contingent, until we Buy it back on their behalf and They Regain Their Placement Through Us & 4% instant return - ultimate fucking guarantee, insured, AAA Sovereign Funds.Wow.

FORTIFIED BOND OF BONDS:

Cash Flow Guarantor - 10B/Year MasterCard Added Profit Set Aside

Collateral Guarantor - 200+ Billion Dollars worth of Marriott/Hyatt Properties

Massive Added Benefit: Bond Of Bonds, instead of a Retirement Funds, means we have no obligation to deliver yearly interest to them. None whatsoever. At all. Besides mutual funds, sovereign funds would salivate for 4% return with 0 risk, via AAA-Sovereign Bonds.

Implications: $10B secures up to $1 Trillion of Investments, including factories that want to take advantage of the tariff and employ the 4M migrant workers at $30K {which is easily afforded, since they are now gained an instant $500M/year revenue, previously lost to trade tax} & and another $500B+ of investment is justified to service the new $100B annual internal purchasing power, and recover their start-up investment in a totally typical 5+ years.

$10 Billion = $1 Trillion of Investment.

30% Market Share held by Other ~ FDIC Insures 7,723 Banking Institutions

Buying Banks Shaves leg work by 99%, If Majority of Shares are publicly traded, you can offer a Tender to purchase all of their shares at 20% above current value, making you the Majority owner - Single Tender VS Marketing/Informing/Securing 10,000s of Individuals, FUCK.

Especially if the Ratio between Market Cap & Total Assets in Long Term Savings accounts is 10:1, as I suspect, since just as a quick pre-analysis glance at Google Finance:

> Bank of America’s Market Cap is $67 Billion, but their assets are $2.2 Trillion: 32:1 {Your Offer To IRA holders was 20%, but you can own a majority controlling share of a Bank for 3% !!! ~ Leaving 17% to Still Incentivize that Conversion to Bonds}

> CitiGroup’s market cap is $87B and has $1.9 Trillion in Assets = 22:1 Ratio = 4.5% !!!!, leaving 15% as internal cash incentive to IRA holders to compel conversion

> 1B Bonds Secured with 200M RPF Funds ~ Allocation: 250M buys a Bank, 750M is incentive fund. ~ At 25X Market Cap:Assets conservative, low ratio = 6.25B ~ 750M Raises 3.75B Worth of IRA/Bond Conversions. ~~~ Pursue Savings-Heavy asset categories, which are most of them, considering the average Traditional IRA balance vs Average Checking Account/Savings Account balances, so fattest chunk of Deposit Assets are IRAs or the like ~~~ Finance secondary entrepreneur, whose assets/credit secured the Bond, restore Properties after paying off Bond & executing the buyback agreement -> Reject the primary entrepreneurs request to borrow -> Finance the secondary entrepreneur with a interest free loan.

Make sure power plants are public companies so that those stocks are redeemable at any time.

When it comes to massively valuable entities like that, there are no individual owners, or they would be worth hundreds of billions, they are majority owned by Shareholders ~~~ No one in the top 26 of the Forbes 400 are in Commercial or Investment Banking, some are Hedge Funds, but they are separate from the Commercial Banking industry. As long as you gain a controlling share, and are able to make certain decisions and offers to compel the conversion, because the fucking bond conversion is voluntary & internal + you gain FDIC assurance.

_____________________________________________________

Coal-Fired Power Plant Construction Costs:

In fact, the estimated costs of building new coal plants have reached $3,500 per kW, without financing costs, and are still expected to increase further. This would mean a cost of well over $2 billion for a new 600 MW coal plant when financing costs are included. ~~~~ {bit.ly/Alu9V6}

Nuclear Power Plant Construction Costs:

Companies that are planning new nuclear units are currently indicating that the total costs (including escalation and financing costs) will be in the range of $5,500/kW to $8,100/kW or between $6 billion and $9 billion for each 1,100
MW plant. ~~~~ {bit.ly/h8yco1}